ACT Science Practice Test 61
Thời gian làm bài: 1 giờ
Hãy bắt đầu chinh phục nào!
Xem trước nội dung:
PASSAGE I
Earth's habitability is sustained by the sun. Currently, the sun provides enough light and warmth to maintain temperature conditions that can support life on our planet. It is undisputed that the sun is a star. All stars go through phases where they change in size, temperature, and brightness. Two scientists present their views on how long Earth will remain habitable.
Scientist 1
Earth's sun has another 7 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. Currently, Earth could not sustain human life during the Red Giant phase. However, it is important not to believe that human life on Earth will immediately cease to exist as we know it in 7 billion years. Technology has played a huge role in helping humans adapt to conditions on this planet. We humans have 7 billion years to advance technology and find solutions to adapt to the atmospheric changes the Red Giant phase would bring. For instance, creating a large sunshade to protect Earth might allow life to continue even when the sun enters the Red Giant phase. Another solution would be to develop technology that would stir the sun and bring new hydrogen to the sun's core. This would greatly extend the current phase that our sun is in. There is enough time and incentive to discover ways to thwart the natural progress of nature. Therefore, I believe that human life on this planet will exist indefinitely.
Scientist 2
The sun will enter its Red Giant phase in about 7 billion years. However, new models suggest that Earth has less than a billion years before atmospheric carbon dioxide levels drop to levels that can no longer support photosynthesis. This would lead to a dramatic temperature increase. Once Earth's average temperature rises to above 70°C, the oceans will evaporate and Earth's water sources will be almost completely eliminated. One billion years is not long enough for humans to evolve in order to meet large atmospheric and environmental changes, or to develop the technology needed to make Earth habitable. In a billion years, atmospheric changes will eliminate all life on Earth as we know it. Humans need to accept the reality that advanced life flourishes for only a limited period of time. Science fiction-inspired plans to create space colonies or massive sunshades are unrealistic and will not likely be developed in the next billion years.
If the interpretation of Scientist 1 is correct, which of the following generalizations about technology is most accurate?
Technology only develops when there is a dire need for it and plenty of time to conduct experiments.
Some technology can either alter or enhance natural forces.
Technology is solely responsible for making the planet habitable.
Technology can help prevent the sun from changing indefinitely.
Studies show that Venus may once have had an atmosphere and environment almost identical to Earth's. Now, Venus has no water on its surface or in its atmosphere. How would Scientist 2 most likely explain the change in Venus's atmosphere and environment?
Venus's living beings were not able to stir the sun to bring new hydrogen to its core.
Venus's sun entered its Red Giant phase much earlier in the planet's development.
The carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere dropped to levels that no longer supported photosynthesis.
Venus's proximity to the sun made it more vulnerable to atmospheric and environmental changes.
Which of the following does Scientist 1 indicate would postpone the sun reaching its Red Giant phase?
Using technology to create space colonies built from pieces of meteorites
Using technology to create a giant sunshade to protect Earth from the sun
Using technology to change the levels of hydrogen in the sun's core
Using technology to increase the amount of hydrogen in Earth's core
Scientist 1 suggests that:
humans will always adapt to any changes in Earth's atmosphere and environment.
the earth will no longer be able to sustain human life in 7 billion years.
sufficient time and incentive are not necessary elements in advancing technology.
creating sunshades would help to increase levels of carbon dioxide in the air, which is important in maintaining life on the planet.
The passage argues that Scientists 1 and 2 disagree on:
whether technology will evolve in time to prevent Earth from becoming inhabitable.
whether the sun will ever enter the Red Giant phase.
whether water and a temperate climate are needed for human survival.
whether the technology to create space colonies already exists.
The views of both scientists are similar because they both argue that:
humans will be able to exist indefinitely on Earth.
7 billion years is long enough to create technology that will protect the earth from a changing sun.
the earth is subject to future atmospheric changes.
it might be possible to discover new planets that are able to sustain human life.
Which of the following findings, if true, would weaken the arguments of Scientist 2?
The planet Venus was unable to sustain life when atmospheric changes occurred.
Studies have shown that, during prehistoric times, Earth's temperature reached 75°
It is impossible to create a space colony large enough to support life for long periods of time.
Recent scientific models have shown that the earth will not be habitable in 1 billion years.
PASSAGE II
Radon is a radioactive gas that occurs naturally in the environment as a result of the decay of uranium. If inhaled into the lungs at high concentrations and over a long period of time, radon gas can increase the chance that an individual will develop lung cancer.
Outdoors, radon levels are rarely high enough to pose a health threat to individuals. Indoors, however, radon is a concern because it can seep into the foundation of a home through the ground and accumulate in areas with little ventilation, where levels can then become threatening. Radon gas can seep from the ground through many different pathways, such as cracks in the basement floor, through drains and sump pumps, or through loose-fitting pipes.
The only way to detect radon levels is through testing, using a specialized sensing device. Radon is colorless and odorless, and the levels are constantly changing from one area to the next and from one day to the next. In addition, radon exposure produces no short-term health symptoms. Therefore, radon levels should be monitored on a regular basis.
Radon potential is an estimate of the radon level of a structure measured in picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L). A picocurie is one-trillionth of a Curie (a measurement unit of radioactivity). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assigns each county in the United States to a zone, based on its radon potential. Radon potential is not used to determine which houses should be tested in an area. Instead, levels are used to determine if radon-resistant features should be installed in new structures being built in an area. Table 1 shows the radon levels in pCi/L for each of 3 zones, with areas in Zone 1 indicating a high radon potential, areas in Zone 2 indicating a moderate radon potential, and areas in Zone 3 indicating a low radon potential.
According to the passage, radon levels are tested indoors because:
radon levels are different in every area, but they are always the same indoors.
radon accumulates in the air inside a home and poses a possible health threat.
radon gas has a strong, unpleasant smell that can only be detected indoors.
radon levels vary from season to season but are similar for most houses.
All of the following are mentioned as characteristics of radon that contribute to the importance of continual in-home testing EXCEPT:
radon is colorless and odorless.
radon produces no short-term symptoms.
radon levels vary from day to day.
radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas.
Studies have shown that existing homes in the same neighborhood can have very different radon levels. Are these findings consistent with information presented in the passage?
No, because radon levels cannot be measured in existing homes.
No, because radon seeps into all homes in the same way.
Yes, because the occurrence of radon is very rare.
Yes, because radon levels vary depending on many different factors.
According to the passage, which of the following radon levels would be considered most harmful?
5.2 pCi/L
4.0 pCi/L
3.0 pCi/L
1.9 pCi/L
Xem thêm đề thi tương tự
12 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
214,106 lượt xem 115,283 lượt làm bài
24 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
219,323 lượt xem 118,090 lượt làm bài
13 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
217,161 lượt xem 116,928 lượt làm bài
13 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
206,346 lượt xem 111,104 lượt làm bài
23 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
218,478 lượt xem 117,635 lượt làm bài
22 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
219,700 lượt xem 118,293 lượt làm bài
24 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
218,955 lượt xem 117,894 lượt làm bài
24 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
219,401 lượt xem 118,132 lượt làm bài
26 câu hỏi 1 mã đề 1 giờ
219,188 lượt xem 118,020 lượt làm bài